Site Demo 365 Daily Buzz

Ed Kilgore wants “antichoicers” to clarify when life begins

By

http://twitter.com/#!/MZHemingway/status/426833473521741824

Well, it’s a good question according to the New Republic’s Jonathan Cohn. And that question is:

http://twitter.com/#!/CitizenCohn/status/426831040519221248

In a blog entry at Washington Monthly, Ed Kilgore ponders the question of when life begins according to the Bible: at conception, or at implantation? “Where is that in Deuteronomy?” he asks.

The reason for asking is cases like Hobby Lobby’s. The craft store chain doesn’t want to be forced to pay for birth control that prevents implantation (such as Plan B or an IUD), believing that those end life that has already begun. The trouble, at least according to Kilgore, is that the Bible doesn’t discuss abortifacients.

If you need an idea of where Kilgore’s coming from, consider his conclusion:

http://twitter.com/#!/seanmdav/status/426833999718141952
http://twitter.com/#!/seanmdav/status/426841617996066816
http://twitter.com/#!/seanmdav/status/426846733859954688

The New York Times’ Nate Cohn also gave his interpretation.

http://twitter.com/#!/CitizenCohn/status/426835940586184704
http://twitter.com/#!/Nate_Cohn/status/426836590447439873

That’s a question the Supreme Court will have to consider when it takes on the Hobby Lobby case. Until then, another look through the Scriptures might be in order to pin down those conservative “antichoicers” and their “sheer extremism.” The irony?

http://twitter.com/#!/mollrob/status/426834330950705152



Comments are closed.